Risk and Crisis Communication about Invisible Hazards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70135/jicrcr.v4i2.53Keywords:
sensemaking, narratives, COVID-19, crisis communication, health communicationAbstract
This article discusses differences between invisible and visible hazards, and how these differences can affect risk and crisis communication. Invisible hazards are risks that we cannot see, and often cannot touch, taste, nor smell. Examples are COVID-19, radon
gas, mold spores, or asbestos fibers. Invisible hazards are often uncertain, complex, and ambiguous risk problems. Results from a Norwegian study show that authorities need to be aware of the possible differences in risk perception among authorities, stakeholders, and the general public. Involving citizens, creating trust, and being honest is important for all risk and crisis communication. However, the less we know about a hazard, the more we need to rely on others to make decisions, and consequently
trust is particularly important when dealing with invisible hazards.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ruth Ø. Skotnes, Kåre Hansen, Anne V. Krøvel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.