Bibliometric approaches on coexistence, discrimination and crisis in organizations

Abstract

The current study conducts a thorough examination of the state of scientific understanding about discrimination, cohabitation, and related issues in modern organizations. Because bibliometrics analysis is a powerful technique, it was used to identify the most pertinent research streams in this field of study. In this manner, research indexed in Scopus was categorized from 2010 to 2024, and researchers' priorities were compared based on their publishing patterns through the search equation ( TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "discrimination" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "Exclusion" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "Marginalization" ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "crisis" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "Coexistence" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "treatment" ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "communication" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "Companies" ) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "organization" ) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "Companies" ) AND PUBYEAR > 2009 AND PUBYEAR < 2025. Among the documents that were found by this study, 310 of a total of 446 were articles. The years 2021 (54), 2022 (47), and 2023 (40) were the years on which most publications occurred. With 369 papers, the United States leads the world in production, followed by Germany with 150 and Iran with 125. Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences has contributed the most to the study topic with 48 contributions, followed by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences with 18. With six (6) contributions, Fathalipour M. was the most cited researcher. Finally, the concepts of "Human," "Article," "Discrimination," "Informed consent," and "Inclusion" were some of the key concepts associated with the area of knowledge.