Protecting the Intellectual Rights of Creators from Attack Using Artificial Intelligence between Jurisprudence and Law: A Descriptive Comparative Study

Abstract

This research aims to study the phenomenon of attacking the intellectual rights of creators using artificial intelligence and protecting them in jurisprudence and law through a comparative study between them, in which the researcher explains what is meant by artificial intelligence and intellectual rights, then shows images of attacks on intellectual rights using artificial intelligence and how jurisprudence and law protected these rights through a comparative study that shows the points of agreement and differences. The researcher followed the descriptive comparative approach, so he sought to clarify the scientific terms in the research, then mentioned some cases of theft of the rights of creators and studied how jurisprudence and law worked to protect them and what they agreed on and what they disagreed on, then he came out with results including the importance of protecting the intellectual rights of creators in the law and activating the moral aspect of protecting rights. He also concluded that working to protect the rights of creators should be collective, not individual, by institutions and governments, and that jurisprudence and law have done a good job of protecting intellectual rights, but with the development of images of attacks on intellectual rights, we need new formulas and intensive cooperation to curb them.